Meet Robert Castillo! Robert is a third-year Mechanical Engineering and Education Studies double major looking to get a PhD in Nuclear Engineering to become a professor. He was previously involved in the Summer Undergraduate Research Program, hosted by the Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, and the Summer Programs for Undergraduate Research, hosted by the Undergraduate Research Centers. Currently, Robert is a member of UC LEADS and is conducting research on the Solar Methane Pyrolysis Project, specifically designed to manufacture the next generation of graphitic carbon-carbon composites, as part of the Nano Transport Research Group under the direction of Dr. Timothy S. Fisher.
1. How did you first get involved in your research project? Tell us a bit about the lab you are in and the research you are conducting!
I am a part of the Nano Transport Research Group (NTRG) under the direction of Dr. Timothy S. Fisher and I work alongside my graduate student mentor, Benjamin T. Heronimus, on the lab’s Solar Methane Pyrolysis Project specifically designed to manufacture the next generation of graphitic carbon-carbon composites! Some applications of these types of C-C composites range from providing superior thermal management within aerospace vehicles in addition to serving as a carbon-neutral option for moderating materials in the next generation of nuclear reactors. My specific focus on this project centers on testing the final composites’ mechanical properties through tensile tests and material characterization, with the hope of one day incorporating indigenous Latin American weaving practices and ion-irradiation campaigns into the scope of the work.
I first got involved in my lab during the Winter Quarter of my first year at UCLA where it honestly took a lot of trial and effort to find the right fit, based both on personal circumstances and opportunities available. I had the chance to attend one of Professor Fisher’s office hour sessions early in the quarter to discuss possible research projects, and it was just a matter of filling out the lab interest form and connecting with Ben to get started on some exciting work!
2. How would you describe your research experience at UCLA?
I think my research experience here at UCLA has been nothing short of uplifting for not only my professional self, but my personal life too. As I started out at this university, I struggled with immense bouts of imposter syndrome and doubts about whether I could keep up with the rigor that is expected at UCLA; however, as my research has become more ingrained into my daily life as a student and I’ve had the chance to meet more researchers outside of my project or NTRG as a whole, I no longer experience these feelings of inadequacy to the same degree. Not to mention, being at the forefront of graphite research reveals a lot of machines and technology you didn’t even know existed, so my experience has been “world-opening” in that regard.
3. What is your year and major?
I am a third-year Mechanical Engineering and Education Studies double major.
4. What is one piece of advice you have for other students thinking about getting involved in research?
My one piece of advice for anyone wanting to get into research is to just apply to that lab or talk to that professor that conducts work you’re interested in no matter what. When I first started out in my lab, I knew absolutely nothing about graphite, composites, or many of the concepts involved in my work. When I applied to NTRG, I had just finished taking Pre-calculus and Introductory Chemistry, with no physics or engineering courses yet on my transcript. Over the course of time in your lab, you will pick up on the flow and procedures even without the contextual classes, so there’s no need to worry!
5. Have you attended a conference before? If so, can you describe your experience on preparation, presenting, etc.?
While I have not attended a conference before, I have presented at a physical poster symposium early on in my research journey. I honestly felt that the hardest part about that event was the amount of time needed to really flesh out my poster, both in content and layout, in a way that followed every requirement listed out by the program. There were a lot of weekly meetings about a month and a half before the symposium date to make sure we had work that fit the guidelines. I think this is good though, since you know that when it is time for the actual poster or vocal presentation, you have passed the hardest part of the entire process; your knowledge and confidence about your research will naturally seep through, even if you don’t realize it in the moment
6. Have you had your work published? Can you talk about what that process was like?
Yes, I was recently included as an author on a NTRG paper publication shared with my PI and my graduate student mentor about the mechanical properties of our carbon-carbon composites. Similar to preparing for a vocal or poster presentation, there is so much preparation to be done even before you begin the actual writing part. A substantial literature review of both current and foundational studies within your field not only makes up a lot of the introductory content, but also how you guide and present your writing later on in the paper. There were a lot of meetings between Professor Fisher, Ben, and myself to establish the narrative and messages we wanted to send through this research. Writing a paper grants you the unique opportunity to combine traditional writing with the world of scientific diagrams and figures to tell your research story, an aspect to this process that I found especially rewarding. I discovered that getting the initial manuscript ready for submission was only the first hurdle, and the review process can take a lot longer than you might first assume, a couple months after your initial submission, actually. It may seem like a lot of difficult work, and it is, but there really isn’t a better feeling than seeing your name on a publication just like the ones you read for your literature review.
7. What are your future career goals?
My future career goals involve getting a Ph.D. in Nuclear Engineering to become a professor in order to intersect my passion for engineering and education. I would love to continue my research interests in nuclear moderating materials to investigate ways to make our current and future fleets of reactors safer for all communities that they reside in.
8. Please list any URC/departmental programs you are/were involved in. How has your experience been in these programs?
I was previously involved in both the SURP and SPUR programs, and I am currently a member of the UC LEADS program that has led to my future involvement in UC Berkeley’s CalNERDS summer research experience. My work in the past two summers with the SURP and SPUR programs were instrumental for honing my skills as a researcher and becoming more connected to my project; learning presentation, poster-making, and experimental design skills are key components to my resume and overall skillset as a student. UC LEADS has provided me access to a plethora of resources surrounding how to become more resilient in the lab, research ethics, and best practices to promote minority success within STEM graduate programs. As I progress through UC LEADS, I know it will be instrumental to helping me apply to graduate school and remaining funded throughout my Ph.D. journey, in addition to the continuing the wonderful connections I have made with my cohort!
9. What was the impact of undergraduate research on your career path?
My experience within undergraduate research has not only molded my intentions to become a professor one day, but also has nailed down my specific interests within the broad field of nuclear energy. Without my time in NTRG and the Solar Methane Pyrolysis project, I do not think I would have as strong of an interest in graphite and carbon-carbon composites as I do now. Through research, I found the perfect way to combine my enthusiasm for engineering and education.
Meet Amit Rand! Amit is a fourth-year Mathematics of Computation major currently conducting research in the Cardiovascular Imaging Research Lab (CVIRL). In addition, Amit was recently accepted into the Undergraduate Research Scholars Program (URSP), a three-quarter scholarship program that supports students who are conducting a life science, physical science, or engineering research project with a UCLA faculty. After completing his PhD, Amit hopes to work at a foundational research lab (industry or academia) focused on cutting-edge mechanistic machine learning, and eventually pursue entrepreneurship. Learn more about Amit and his UCLA research experience below.
1. How did you first get involved in your research project? Tell us a bit about the lab you are in and the research you are conducting (if possible)!
I joined the Cardiovascular Imaging Research Lab (CVIRL) under Prof. Kim-Lien Nguyen and Prof. J. Paul Finn at the David Geffen School of Medicine shortly after transferring to UCLA, and I’ve been in the lab since July 2024. I’m fortunate to be mentored by Dr. Kim-Lien Nguyen and her post-doctoral fellows, Dr. Thomas Coudert and Dr. Mostafa Mahmoudi, and to work with her collaborator, Prof. Dan Ruan, as part of a broader effort to accelerate MRI using machine learning.
A core challenge in MRI is that scans can be time-consuming, which often requires patients to hold their breath to reduce motion and improve image quality. Our long-term goal is to enable free-breathing MRI that improves the patient experience without sacrificing diagnostic fidelity. My work focuses on using generative modeling methods to reconstruct images from faster, more limited measurements. I initially joined the lab through a different project and later transitioned into this direction. Along the way, working closely with postdoctoral scholars and project scientists has been especially formative.
2. How would you describe your research experience at UCLA?
My research experience at UCLA has been incredibly positive and impactful. Through the Student Research Program (SRP), I have been able to dedicate structured, accredited time to research while staying on track academically. In addition to participating in SRP throughout the past year, this quarter I have been able to conduct full-time research through a 12-unit SRP enrollment, which has been especially aligned with my goal of pursuing a PhD. I have also felt strongly supported by mentors across the lab, including faculty, postdocs, and graduate researchers, who consistently make time to teach, give feedback, and help students grow.
Working in a clinical research environment has been uniquely motivating because I can see the real-world importance of the problems we’re solving and how they connect to patient care. I’ve also benefited a lot from URC resources and research-focused seminars, especially sessions that demystify topics like getting started in research and preparing for graduate school.
Additionally, I have felt supported more broadly within UCLA’s academic environment as I have pursued research. I have been fortunate to take multiple graduate-level courses through instructors’ consideration and encouragement, and those experiences have strengthened my technical foundation and clarified the research directions I want to pursue going forward.
3. What is your year and major?
Senior (Class of 2026) and Mathematics of Computation
4. What is one piece of advice you have for other students thinking about getting involved in research? As a transfer student yourself, do you have advice specific to other transfer students?
If you’re even considering research, try it. There’s no “perfect time” to start, and it’s often the best way to discover what you enjoy. Many faculty and labs are genuinely excited to mentor motivated undergraduates, especially when you reach out with a clear interest, willingness to learn, and commitment.
For transfer students specifically, leverage UCLA’s structured programs, especially URC Sciences, early, because they can accelerate your integration into the research community. And if it’s hard to get traction at first, don’t be discouraged. Reach out to postdocs and graduate students, too. They can often offer a smaller, well-scoped project that helps you build confidence, skills, and momentum toward a deeper research role. However, be mindful of postdocs’ and graduate students’ time, and always reach out to the Principal Investigator before starting any project.
5. Have you attended a conference before? If so, can you describe your experience on preparation, presenting, etc.?
I recently attended my first conference, The Thirty-Ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), where I presented a workshop paper. It was an amazing experience to be surrounded by experts in the field and to have so many conversations across a wide range of topics.
In preparation, I created my first poster, applied for grants to help cover the cost of attendance and travel, and made sure I could clearly explain my work. For presenting, it helps to have a strong two to five minute overview ready, then be prepared to answer questions and engage in deeper discussion. Most interactions move quickly, but the best conversations are with people working on closely related problems. I was fortunate to speak with teams from Microsoft Research, professors from Cambridge and Emory, and researchers at Toyota Research Institute about parallel ideas and directions.
One piece of advice I would carry forward is to attend the full conference if you can. Being there for the entire week makes a big difference for learning and networking.
6. Have you had your work published? Can you talk about what that process was like?
I have published a peer-reviewed workshop paper at NeurIPS as a co-first author, based on independent research with a peer.
The review process was a valuable first-time experience. I learned how to interpret reviewer feedback, respond thoughtfully to critiques, and iterate on the work to strengthen the final submission. Because NeurIPS workshops are peer reviewed, I was also assigned a few papers to review, which gave me experience seeing the process from the reviewer’s perspective and helped me better understand what makes a submission clear, rigorous, and compelling.
7. What are your future career goals?
After completing my PhD, I hope to work at a foundational research lab (industry or academia) focused on cutting-edge mechanistic machine learning, and eventually pursue entrepreneurship. I believe we are at the start of a major transition, and I want to help build the systems that will shape our world by making them safer, more reliable, while being grounded in the real-world. Longer term, I would also love to return to academia in a teaching-focused role at the university level.
8. Please list any URC/departmental programs you are/were involved in. How has your experience been in these programs?
This year (2025–2026), I have been part of the Undergraduate Research Scholars Program (URSP) Sciences, and I also took the RES PRC 194B graduate school application seminar.
URSP is a scholarship program and provides a strong support system. It supplies resources that make it easier to navigate research and build a clearer path forward to ultimately achieve your goals. One of the most memorable parts was access to the research practices courses (RES PRC).
The graduate school applications seminar with Dr. Hasson was especially helpful. The course is designed to help you build every component of a graduate application end-to-end, then refine it through structured feedback from peers and professors who have either gone through the process or are going through it alongside you.
9. What was the impact of undergraduate research on your career path?
Undergraduate research has been the main reason I am now committed to pursuing a PhD and building a long-term career in research. As a transfer student, my path into research was not straightforward, and community college made it clear how challenging it can be to access both research and industry opportunities. Over the past few years, I completed about five industry internships and three research experiences, which gave me a meaningful basis to compare the two.
While I initially expected to go directly into industry, my research experiences were more fulfilling on an intellectual and technical level, and they gave me a stronger sense of purpose and curiosity in my work. Ultimately, undergraduate research shaped my career direction by helping me realize that I want to contribute by doing deep, long-term research and mentorship in the field.
Meet Henley Roy! Henley is a fourth-year Biochemistry and Business Economics major and has been involved in the URC – Sciences Summer Program and the Undergraduate Research Fellows Program (URFP). She is currently conducting research in the Petrovic Lab and works on examining nuclear import mechanisms of Yes-associated protein. In the future, Henley hopes to attend graduate school and obtain a research position in industry or academia.
1. How did you first get involved in your research project? Tell us a bit about the lab you are in and the research you are conducting!
I joined the Petrovic Lab in Fall of 2024 when the lab was just starting up! Currently the project I work on examines nuclear import mechanisms of Yes-associated protein (YAP1), which is a transcriptional coactivator that is dysregulated in triple negative breast cancer. This protein is too large to enter the nucleus through passive diffusion, but also lacks a canonical nuclear localization signal (NLS) typically required for active transport by importin proteins, making its import mechanisms unclear. To study this pathway, I have expressed and purified protein constructs of YAP1 and candidate importin protein interactors, and I am testing binding interactions between these proteins.
2. How would you describe your research experience at UCLA?
My research experiences at UCLA have been an amazing learning experience. My graduate student mentors and PI’s have taught me many fundamental technical wet lab skills, but also how to practice scientific communication and proposal writing which are important for a wide variety of future career trajectories.
3. What is your year and major?
4th year, Biochemistry and Business Economics major
4. What is one piece of advice you have for other students thinking about getting involved in research?
If you are thinking about getting involved in research do it! The only way you can know if you like it or not is if you try it.
5. What are your future career goals?
I hope to attend graduate school and conduct research in Protein Biochemistry/Structural Biology, and eventually obtain a research position in industry or academia.
6. Please list any URC/departmental programs you are/were involved in. How has your experience been in these programs?
I was involved in the URC Summer Sciences program as well as the URFP program. These programs have provided me invaluable guidance and mentorship, as well as financial support which allows me to focus more time on my research.
7. What was the impact of undergraduate research on your career path?
My experiences in undergraduate research set me on the trajectory of applying to PhD programs in Biochemistry, which is something I never thought I would do coming into college. They helped me realize how much I love working in a lab and working with other scientists!
Meet Cara Susilo! Cara is a fourth-year Bioengineering major, currently conducting research at the Kamariza Lab focusing on protein engineering with Cas enzymes, and culturing and extracting genomic DNA from non-tuberculous myobacteria. Cara has attended several national conferences, including the Biomedical Engineering Society Conference and the American Society for Microbiology Conference, and was recently published as a second author on her lab’s first publication. Read Cara’s full interview below.
1. How did you first get involved in your research project? Tell us a bit about the lab you are in and the research you are conducting (if possible)!
I became involved in research during Winter Quarter of my freshman year where I joined the Kamariza Lab in the Bioengineering Department. For most of my time, I worked on project demonstrating how solvatochromic trehalose probes can not only detect drug resistant tuberculosis, but differentiate between susceptible and resistant TB using a plate reader as a low cost and point-of-care friendly readout. I was also fortunate to join this project from its inception all the way to publication, and as one of the first members of the Kamariza Lab, I have had the pleasure of watching it grow! Today, I’m working on two new projects, specifically focusing on protein engineering with Cas enzymes, and culturing and extracting genomic DNA from non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Our lab is incredible diverse and supportive, and the graduate students do an amazing job ensuring undergrads have quality mentorship.
2. How would you describe your research experience at UCLA?
My research experience has been incredibly positive. I was able to strengthen technical skills and solidify my own research drive as I worked throughout the year, and opportunities to present within my department and during Undergraduate Research Week has been helped me in this process. The support I received from my department and URC has significantly impacted my experience, and I am thankful for the opportunities I’ve had throughout the last four years!
3. What is your year and major?
Fourth year Bioengineering
4. What is one piece of advice you have for other students thinking about getting involved in research? As a transfer student yourself, do you have advice specific to other transfer students?
Don’t be afraid to put yourself out there and send that cold email! Research gives so much more than just technical skills, you also learn how to do data analysis, develop scientific literacy skills, and participate in science on such a hands-on level. Show your passion and willingness to learn, and the opportunity will come to you.
5. Have you attended a conference before? If so, can you describe your experience on preparation, presenting, etc.?
I have attended several national conferences including BMES and ABRCMS. Preparing the poster or oral presentation is sometimes challenging, but you get to really understand the science as you make it. For poster sessions, a lot of grad students and even professors stopped by. It was slightly intimidating at first, but I ended up connecting with other exciting undergrads and people in academia at all levels. They also gave really helpful feedback on presenting and also other possible experiments which I could bring back to the lab.
6. Have you had your work published? Can you talk about what that process was like?
I recently published as a second author on our labs first publication! The majority of the process was spent performing experiments, discussing the data, and performing follow-up experiments. As my grad student was writing the manuscript, I helped write a couple of the methods and captions, and helped proofread before we submitted. I also performed some of the revision experiments. While there were many late nights and early mornings, seeing the publication accepted made the work worth it.
7. What are your future career goals?
I hope to go to graduate school to pursue a PhD in Bioengineering or Chemical Engineering. Afterwards, I plan to enter the biotechnology industry as a scientist.
8. Please list any URC/departmental programs you are/were involved in. How has your experience been in these programs?
During the summer of my freshman year, I participated in the URC Sciences Summer Program which funded summer research. In the spring of my second year, I was awarded the UC LEADS Fellowship. With their support, I could continue developing other essential research skills, and participated in the Summer Research Training Program at UCSF this past summer as part of their second summer.
9. What was the impact of undergraduate research on your career path?
Prior to joining a lab, I was less inclined to pursue graduate school and wanted to go straight into industry. But throughout the past couple of years, I found value in graduate school, especially in further specializing within bioengineering, and refining scientific skills on the bench. I’ve gained an appreciate for graduate work as well, and in seeing my own grad student’s experiences, I have been inspired to go to the next level.
These student highlights were published by the University of California – Los Angeles (UCLA). Find the original article by clicking on the researcher’s name in the article.
The Council on Undergraduate Research community mourns the loss of Mike Doyle, a founding member of CUR and a tireless champion of undergraduate research.
Mike served as CUR’s first president from 1979–1983 and again from 1987–1989, helping to shape the organization during its formative years. His leadership and vision were instrumental in establishing a strong foundation for what CUR has become today. He was also a passionate advocate for the National Conference on Undergraduate Research (NCUR), recognizing early on the power of bringing students together to share their work and build community.
In 1991, Mike authoredA Brief History of CUR: The Early Years, capturing the spirit, challenges, and aspirations that guided the organization’s beginnings. A tribute to his impact as CUR President, entitled A Million Ideas a Minute, was published in the September 1993 issue of the CUR Quarterly. His reflections remain an important record of CUR’s origins and the values that continue to guide our work.
Mike’s legacy lives on through the thousands of students, faculty, and institutions impacted by undergraduate research and by the community he helped build. We are grateful for his leadership, his commitment, and his enduring belief in the power of undergraduate research to change lives.
Rather than hand off writing to chatbots, college students in pilots showed that they use them to brainstorm and help get started. Kriangsak Koopattanakij/iStock via Getty Images
Debates about generative AI in higher education have been informed by studies of completed student papers, or self-reported survey data. Research shows that artificial intelligence tools can support learning, but also has raised concerns, including students’ overreliance, cheating, and the potential degradation of critical thinking and engagement.
While these types of studies provide interesting snapshots of reported practices, their methodologies may hide something important: how writing actually unfolds while students are composing with the assistance of AI.
A pilot study I led of undergraduate writers at Kennesaw State University takes a different approach. Using think-aloud protocols – a method where participants verbalize their thoughts while performing – our research captures how students interact with generative AI tools during the writing process itself. This method helps us understand decision-making processes as they occur.
Our preliminary findings suggest a more complex reality than the common narrative that students are simply having AI write their assignments. Instead, many students appear to be negotiating when and how AI belongs in their writing.
Looking inside the writing process
In our study, 20 undergraduate students completed a 20-minute writing session responding to the following prompt:
People spend a lot of time trying to achieve perfection in their personal or professional lives. People often demand perfection from others, creating expectations that may be challenging to live up to. In contrast, some people think perfection is not attainable or desirable.
The assignment was to draft a thesis and evidence-based paragraphs that argue their position on the value of striving for perfection. Students were told they were not expected to complete them but to work through their writing process toward finishing. Students were told there were no right or wrong ways to use AI and were asked to use generative AI exactly as they normally would while writing.
Instead of direct observation, the study relied on post-session screen recordings and analysis of students describing their process. Collecting this data – their actions on the computer and transcripts of the voice recordings – allowed researchers to analyze the writing process without interrupting it. To reduce the possibility that students might alter their behavior if they felt observed, researchers set a timer and left the room during the writing session. The goal was to minimize the Hawthorne Effect, a phenomenon in which people change their behavior because they know they are being watched.
What we found
Across the transcripts, a few qualitative patterns consistently emerged in how students collaborated with AI while writing.
First, many participants turned to AI at the beginning of the writing process to help generate ideas or draft a thesis.
What we see in this practice is the student using AI-generated output to spark and shape their own ideas. One student explained the strategy this way: “After [generating a few ideas,] I usually just use that [output] as a prompt.”
In these moments, AI functioned less as a final answer and more as a brainstorming tool that helped students move past the blank page.
However, students frequently continued drafting independently after generating initial ideas. Many transcripts include statements such as “I think my thesis should be …” or “Let me write this part,” suggesting that some students retained control over their argument.
Editing the bot
Another strong pattern across transcripts is that students rarely accept AI text without editing it. Instead, they actively revise the generated language. As one student described the process, the AI “rewrites” their initial prompts and then the student rewrites the AI’s output. This allows the student to claim “authorship and ownership” of the final draft.
Another participant redirected the AI response when it did not align with the assignment: “AI is not following the prompt … try again.”
These moments show students evaluating AI output critically and treating it almost as a sparring partner, rather than simply copying it.
We also found that some students rejected AI’s suggestions altogether.
In several writing sessions, participants explicitly decided not to use the AI responses. One student reflected on this decision while composing: “I don’t really use AI for my research.”
Other transcripts show students switching back to their own writing when AI responses felt too generic or disconnected from their argument. These moments indicate that students are not only collaborating with AI, but they are also drawing boundaries around where it belongs in their writing process.
Finally, several transcripts showed students turning to AI during moments of uncertainty or when they felt stuck.
As one participant explained, “I used a lot of AI because I was struggling.”
Even in those cases, students often used AI as support as they drafted their essays, rather than directly copying and pasting its responses.
What this says about AI and writing
Our analysis suggests that generative AI is entering student writing not as a wholesale replacement for human authorship, but as part of a negotiated collaboration. The results suggest that AI most often enters the composing process during idea generation, revision and moments of writer’s block, while students maintain control over argument choice, voice and final phrasing.
Understanding how decisions to use AI unfold during the writing process, and not just what appears in the final essay, may help educators design assignments and policies that keep the human writer firmly at the helm.
Because our current findings come from a pilot cohort of 20 undergraduate writers, the results should be interpreted cautiously. To test whether these patterns hold at a larger scale, the research team is expanding the study to 100 undergraduate participants. The expanded study will also examine how neurodivergent writers interact with generative AI during composing, an area that remains largely unexplored in current research.
Undergraduate student researchers at Kennesaw State contributed to the preliminary analysis described in this article: Kylee Johnson, Vara Nath, Ruth Sikhamani and Kaylee Ward.
Written by Jeanne Beatrix Law for the Kennesaw State University; used with permission. Find the original article here.
Bentley students share insights from their research and creative projects during the university’s 22nd Annual Undergraduate Research Day. Clockwise from top left: Honors Program student Jaden Hecht ’25, FirstGen Presidential Fellow Daelle Guirand ’25, Honors Program student Jacob Palhares ’25, and Franchesca Vilmenay ’26, Valente Center research assistant with Bentley’s Center for Integration of Science and Industry. (Photos by Maddie Schroder and Katherine Avendano)
Employers expect business school graduates to excel at interpreting financial statements and identifying market trends. But they’re often surprised — and delighted — to discover that Bentley students are equally adept at exploring AI applications in the health industry, evaluating the environmental impacts of electric vehicle use and investigating what young professionals value most in modern workplace culture.
Each year, hundreds of Bentley students enhance their academic experience by engaging in one (or more) of the research-related opportunities available to undergraduates. These include:
Bentley Honors Program — Students complete one of six different Pathway Experiences: Research, Creative, Corporate Immersion, DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion), Economics and Service-Learning.
FirstGen Presidential Fellows Program — Students complete a Signature Work Project that draws on academic research, applied learning experiences and faculty mentorship to address how business leaders can support the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Valente Center for Arts and Sciences — Students can support faculty-led projects through the center’s Student Research Assistantship program or pursue their own studies through the Undergraduate Researcher program.
Working individually or in groups and guided by faculty mentors, students in these programs “explore complex, challenging problems by bringing together the relevance and rigor they’ve learned in the classroom,” says Paul Tesluk, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs. He notes that engaging in research challenges undergraduates to think deeply, ask hard questions and embrace complexity — skills that will serve them well professionally, regardless of the field they choose.
Studies also show that research experience gives graduates a competitive edge in an increasingly crowded job market. According to the American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U), 85% of employers reported they were “somewhat” or “much more” likely to hire workers with experience in academic, community-based or service-learning projects. And a National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) study found that the top five qualities employers look for among candidates — problem-solving skills, ability to work in a team, communication skills, initiative and strong work ethic — are all enhanced through scholarly and creative inquiry.
These qualities were on full display during Bentley’s 22nd Annual Undergraduate Research Day, when more than 140 Bentley students shared insights from their projects. In his welcome remarks, Tesluk painted a bigger picture of the benefits of undergraduate research. “In our broader environment right now, the very essence of scholarship is in many ways at stake,” he said. “What we’re doing here today demonstrates Bentley’s commitment to knowledge production and academic inquiry — and how vital this is for advancing society.”
Here, we highlight a few of the research and creative projects our Falcons completed this year:
Ally Casciano ’25
Majors: Finance, Liberal Studies Major: Global Sustainability
Minor: Law
Faculty Advisor: Ryan Bouldin, associate professor, Natural and Applied Sciences
Project: “Passive House Design”
“A passive house is a building engineered to produce zero carbon emissions and run entirely on renewable resources,” Casciano explains. “I chose it as my LSM research topic because of my personal interest in architecture and interior design and because it reflects all of the disciplines — finance, sustainability, law — I’ve studied during my time at Bentley.”
Casciano used SketchUp, a 3D modeling software, to design a single-family home that incorporates energy-efficient strategies like passive solar design (a non-mechanical method of collecting, storing and distributing solar energy) and green roof systems (rooftop “gardens” that absorb rainwater and improve air quality). To determine the home’s long-term financial viability, she compared estimated construction costs with energy savings over time — and found her eco-friendly design yielded an impressive ROI of $80,000 over 25 years.
“As a creative person in a business school, I feel fortunate to have the opportunity to pursue this passion project,” Casciano says. “I’ve learned a lot about myself and the career I want to follow.” Now that she’s graduated, she’s working full-time as a project engineer for a Boston-based construction and development firm. “I hope to obtain green building certifications in this role and one day build my passive house design in real life.”
Valeria Escamilla ’25
Major: Health Industries
Minor: Marketing
Faculty Advisor: Danielle Blanch Hartigan, Chester B. Slade Professor of Psychology and executive director, Center for Health and Business
Project: “AI in Optometry”
“The optical industry has been part of my life for as long as I can remember,” says Escamilla, whose parents founded a chain of full-service eye clinics in Bogota, Colombia, and Miami. “Growing up, I saw firsthand how the field can change lives. Helping people through optometry became my lifelong dream.”
As Escamilla sees it, AI tools can help patients achieve optimal eye health. The industry is already using AI to analyze retinal scans for early stages of eye disease, provide more precise measurements for cataracts surgery and create progressive lenses (i.e., bifocals) custom-tailored to an individual’s visual habits. Yet, few patients know about these options — an “awareness gap” she sought to explore through her research.
In a survey Escamilla conducted, she found that:
76% of respondents were unaware of current AI uses, but were open to AI improving their vision care
57% would use AI to help choose lenses
69% would use AI to predict future eye problems
But respondents also expressed concern about the lack of transparency in AI’s underlying algorithms, underscoring the importance of trust between patients and clinicians. “People are cautious when it comes to data privacy and diagnostic accuracy,” Escamilla says. “Providers must be able to clearly communicate how AI works to their patients.”
Escamilla, who begins optometry school this fall, is grateful for the opportunity “to explore technological trends in the industry I love.” She is committed to continuing her research efforts in the future. “I want to open eye care practices that are both clinics and research hubs, where I can collaborate with fellow optometrists and field experts,” she shares. “Together, we can design solutions to address growing challenges — including innovation, awareness and accessibility — in the optical industry.”
Cameron Krinsky ’25, MSF ’25
Major: Finance (Advanced Standing in Finance program)
Faculty Advisor: Laura Jackson Young, associate professor, Economics
Project: “Electric Vehicles: The Future of Transportation or a Forgotten Failure?”
A self-professed auto enthusiast, Krinsky volunteered as a docent for two Rhode Island car museums prior to enrolling at Bentley. In his view, automobiles aren’t merely machines, but “works of art that convey unique and compelling stories.” Arriving on campus, he immediately joined the Bentley Car Club, a student-run organization where he could share his passion with like-minded peers.
When it was time to choose a topic for his Honors Research Pathway, Krinsky’s love for all things automotive steered him toward electric vehicles (EVs). Since they run on electric batteries instead of gasoline- or diesel-powered combustion engines, EVs are widely considered a key method for mitigating climate change. Federal, state and local regulations have been enacted in recent years to encourage Americans to switch to EVs.
Intrigued by the environmental, economic and social impacts of widespread EV use, Krinsky set out to compile comprehensive data for each area. “Prior to conducting this research, I was skeptical about the efficacy of mass EV adoption,” he says. “But what I learned made me aware of issues I’d never previously considered.”
One example: How an increased demand for lithium — an essential component in EV batteries — poses significant risks to environmental and human health. Extracting the metal requires enormous amounts of fresh water, Krinsky discovered, which diverts the vital resource away from local communities. The mining process also releases toxic chemicals that contaminate soil and groundwater and compromise air quality.
Krinsky, who accepted a full-time position as a credit risk analyst in Santander’s corporate and investment banking division after interning with the company last summer, is grateful to Bentley for facilitating his research. “As someone who believes transportation is critical to the well-being and advancement of society, this project was truly eye-opening.”
Jacob Palhares ’25
Major: Corporate Finance and Accounting
Faculty Advisor: Brian Wilson, lecturer, English and Media Studies
Project: “Business as Usual, Play as Exception”
For his Honors Creative Pathway — a photo essay exploring the increasingly elusive pursuit of work-life balance — Palhares drew inspiration from his personal life. “Anyone who knows me will tell you I stress way too much about things, whether it’s preparing for an upcoming exam or meeting a project deadline for my job,” he shares. “After talking about this with friends and family, I realized I wasn’t alone.” Advances in technology have blurred the line between our personal and professional lives, he says, giving rise to “an ever-growing expectation in the corporate world that employees can (and even should) work from anywhere, at any time.”
His photo essay features portraits of young professionals wearing business attire while engaged in leisurely pursuits, such as snowboarding, tennis and playing poker. “I wanted to use humor and irony to invite conversations about a topic that others might find hard to address,” Palhares explains. “These images visualize the tension between professional obligations and personal fulfillment but do so in a way that brings joy and laughter to the audience.”
Palhares, who plans to become a Certified Financial Planner (CFP) and work in the field of wealth management, is thankful the Honors Program gives students the option to engage in creative pursuits. As he notes, “This project really forced me to practice what I was preaching — to step away from work and school and spend more time doing something I really enjoy.”
Sam Potter ’25
Major: Corporate Finance and Accounting
Faculty Advisor: Johannes Eijmberts, senior lecturer, Global Studies, and director, Valente Center for Arts and Sciences
Project: “Modern Workplace Culture and the Motivational Drivers of Young Professionals”
While interning with a global supply chain finance team last summer, “I became interested in how cultural differences affect negotiation tactics and business collaboration,” Potter shares. When he later joined the Valente Center’s Undergraduate Researcher program, he decided to make cultural diversity in the workplace the focus of his independent study.
Potter was particularly interested in exploring generational differences. “With the rise of remote work and changing workforce dynamics,” he explains, “there’s been a corresponding shift in employee motivation, especially among young professionals.” To better understand what younger employees value most in the workplace, Potter developed a survey that he sent to all Bentley undergraduate and graduate students.
“The data indicates a strong correlation between motivation and factors such as salary, autonomy and structured responsibilities,” he says of his findings. The survey also revealed that young professionals, regardless of their cultural backgrounds, seek authentic personal connections — “not from their organization as a whole, but from smaller workplace groups or select coworkers,” he explains. “This suggests that managers need to adapt their leadership strategies to foster inclusive team environments and strong mentorship networks.”
Potter, who hopes to find a full-time finance- or research-related role, characterizes his work with the Valente Center as a “highly rewarding experience” — and one he encourages fellow Falcons to consider: “We’re fortunate at Bentley to have the opportunity to explore topics we’re passionate about but aren’t necessarily exposed to in our normal business classes.”
Nereyda Betances ’25, Erica Estrella ’25 and Zoe Ragland-Haines ’25
Majors: Marketing (Nereyda and Zoe), Mathematical Sciences (Erica)
Minors: Management (Nereyda and Erica); Computer Information Systems (Zoe)
Faculty Advisors: Isa Beltre, senior lecturer, Marketing, and associate director, FirstGen Presidential Fellows Program, and Jane De León Griffin, professor, Modern Languages, and Associate Provost for Student Success
Project: “Shaping Tomorrow, One Community at a Time”
For their Signature Work Project, the trio of FirstGen Presidential Fellows explained how their academic and extracurricular activities at Bentley enhanced their understanding of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) — 17 interconnected objectives that guide global development efforts.
For Betances, participating in Bentley’s MOSAIC Experience, a pre-orientation program for first year and transfer students of color and allies, emphasized the importance of SDG #10: Reduced Inequalities. “I was super nervous coming into Bentley,” she shares. “As a student of color at a PWI [Predominantly White Institution], I thought I’d be homesick and wouldn’t make any friends. But MOSAIC creates a space where students like me can forge friendships and receive specialized guidance and support to succeed in our first year of college.” As such, the MOSAIC Experience helps support SDG #10 by helping to foster a more equitable and inclusive campus environment.
Both Estrella and Ragland-Haines highlighted their involvement with Bentley’s Service-Learning and Civic Engagement Center (BSCLE). As program manager for the Waltham Family School, “I taught English to Spanish-speaking mothers, helping them build the language skills they need to navigate daily life, support their education and gain greater independence,” Estrella shares. “As the daughter of immigrants, this was particularly meaningful, since my parents enrolled in a similar program when they arrived in the U.S.” In addition to SDG #4: Quality Education, the BSLCE program supports SDG #8: Decent Work and Economic Growth, she notes, by “helping moms develop the tools and confidence they need to pursue future job opportunities.”
Ragland-Haines also served as a BSCLE program manager, serving youth in a lower-income Waltham housing community through the Prospect Hill Afterschool Program. She and fellow Falcons provided healthy snacks (supporting SDG #2: Zero Hunger) and helped with homework (SDG #4) — an experience she characterizes as “my absolute favorite thing that I did during my time at Bentley.”
Through the BSCLE’s partnership with the Yawkey Foundation, Ragland-Hines also interned in the Malden, Massachusetts, office of U.S. Congresswoman Katherine Clark. The experience provided “a deep understanding of how our government works and why it’s important for local and federal governments to work together,” she shares. Her work with Rep. Clark’s office led directly to a second internship, facilitated by The Fund for American Studies. Working with the National Association for Wholesaler-Distributors (NAW), Ragland-Haines saw firsthand how domestic trade, in particular interstate commerce, plays a vital role in the U.S. economy. These internships, she says, helped illustrate the importance of SDG #9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, SDG #11: Sustainable Cities and Communities and SDG #16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions.
All three FirstGen Presidential Fellows appreciate the hands-on opportunities Bentley provided “to demonstrate our understanding of pressing global challenges and our ability, both individually and collectively, to address them.” And each is committed to advancing the U.N. SDGs in their personal and professional lives. Now that they’ve graduated, Betances is pursuing a full-time marketing position, Estrella is spending six weeks in Spain as a nonprofit consultant and Ragland-Haines is moving to Houston, Texas, to pursue a career in digital marketing.
Written by Molly Mastantuono for the Bentley University; used with permission. Find the original article here.
Key’Rra Moore didn’t just come to UMKC for a degree — she grew into herself here. From taking on-campus leadership roles to pursuing meaningful research, Moore’s story is one of growth, belonging and purpose.
Photos of Key’Rra Moore by Derrick Benitz
A Welcoming Campus That Felt Like Home
Choosing UMKC was intentional for Moore, shaped by family influence and a deep desire to stay in her hometown of Kansas City. Her mother, a UMKC alumna who returned to college as a non-traditional student, often spoke highly of the support she received from her alma mater. That history, combined with the university’s welcoming community, made Moore feel immediately at ease.
“I didn’t expect to feel this included, not just welcomed but truly seen,” she said.
Moore’s campus involvement reflects that sense of belonging. She leads as president of the Student Justice Alliance, serves as secretary of Sisters Circle and holds leadership roles in Psychology Club, Psi Chi, Emerging Research Scholars and is involved with Undergraduate Research and Creative Scholarship. Her footprint on campus is deep and so is her impact.
Turning Personal Motivation Into Academic Purpose
Moore’s academic path is grounded in personal experiences with mental health challenges in her family.
“I saw how those challenges affected people I love,” Moore said. “I wanted to understand why and how we can do better.”
That drive led her to psychology, not just as a major but as a calling. She is passionate about mental health advocacy, especially in communities where it is still stigmatized and underserved.
Her coursework, leadership and interactions with like-minded peers helped her see psychology as a mission instead of subject. That mission now propels her toward graduate school, where she plans to continue her journey toward becoming a therapist or psychologist.
“I would love to continue my education at UMKC,” she said. “It’s such a supportive community and the education is great and affordable. The university does such a good job to propel us, and they really put their students on the right track with all the resources they have.”
Finding Research and Confidence Through Initiative
Moore’s research journey did not begin with an automatic invitation. It started with initiative.
After completing an independent project, she wanted more research experience. She reached out directly to faculty in the psychology department seeking opportunities. When she emailed Jacob Marszalek, Ph.D., expressing her interest and willingness to learn, he kept her in mind and eventually connected her to a meaningful research project.
“That experience taught me that sometimes you don’t wait for the door to open, you find the door and knock,” Moore said. “By doing so, I got to find a project I’m aligned with and interested in.”
Before this, Moore joined Emerging Research Scholars, a program directed by Kimberly Johnson, Ed.D., that prepares students for research through cohort discussions and reflection activities. She also serves as a research ambassador with the Undergraduate Research and Creative Scholarship Office, advocating for research access, tabling at events and building confidence in presenting her work.
This exposure strengthened her professional readiness and her belief in what she can contribute to the research community.
“The Undergraduate Research Office is fantastic,” Moore said. “They advocate for undergraduate students to have more resources and opportunities for research. They also help students with their research presentations and find ways to let them go to conferences to present their research. It’s really special because there are not many opportunities for undergraduate students in research but there are at UMKC.”
Research With Real-World Impact
Moore’s current research goes beyond theory. She collaborates with Synergy Services, a community partner supporting families affected by domestic violence.
Under the mentorship of Sara Brammer (M.A. ‘99, Ph.D. ‘06) and with statistical support from Marszalek, Moore’s role centers on conducting literature reviews to help build a foundation for a program aimed at reducing repeat domestic violence offenses among male perpetrators.
While she is not leading the project, she plays an essential role in shaping its direction.
“What motivates me most is knowing that this work can help real people,” she said. “Not just in academic journals but in the lives of families and local communities.”
Mentorship That Transformed Her Experience
For Moore, mentorship has been transformative in her academic journey. She points to Toya Like, Ph.D., as a pivotal figure. When Moore reached out asking for guidance, Like responded quickly with genuine encouragement.
“She is so impressive and has done so much,” Moore said. “Seeing a Black woman researcher who is also an author really made me feel close to her. At the time, I just emailed her to see if she was willing to mentor me, and she was so enthusiastic and encouraging. She really wants all her students to do well and reminded me that I belong in this space.”
She also reflects on the influence of Brammer and Marszalek, and how their impact is going to help her in graduate school.
“I had a little bit of imposter syndrome when I first started doing my research,” she said. “But they’ve been so great with offering support while giving me opportunities and guiding me through everything. It’s really going to help me in my academic career.”
Preparation for Life Beyond College
Looking ahead, Moore is applying to UMKC graduate programs in counseling and social work, a natural continuation of her academic and professional journey.
She credits her readiness to UMKC’s support systems, including mentorship, cohort experiences, scholarships such as Professional Career Escalators that teach career skills like negotiation and workplace navigation, and a community that meets students where they are.
“UMKC prepared me not just academically but personally for life beyond college,” she said. “I learned to advocate for myself, work with a variety of teams and show up confidently in places where I once felt uncertain.”
Her journey is more than spotlight of individual achievement. It is a testament to the impact a supportive university with meaningful mentorships and opportunities can have on a student’s life and future.
“I came here looking for a place to belong and grew into someone I’m proud to be,” Moore said. “I’m now someone with a voice, a purpose and the confidence to keep growing in every aspect of my life.”
Written by Zoe Miglore for the University of Missouri – Kansas City; used with permission. Find the original article here.
Maria Fernanda Araoz Pozo and Dr. Adam Benfield collecting a 120-cm peat core at Bear Meadows using a Russian peat corer.
Maria Fernanda Araoz Pozo, a 2025 Northeastern Section GSA Undergraduate Research Grant recipient, is using high-elevation peatlands in central Pennsylvania to explore how fire and environmental change shaped the landscape over thousands of years.
Her GSA grant supports five accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon dates for peat cores collected at Bear Meadows. These dates provide the timeline for her honors thesis, allowing her to place charcoal, macrofossil, and geochemical records into a precise temporal framework. With this information, Maria can investigate questions about Holocene fire activity, peatland development, and landscape dynamics.
From the field to the lab, Maria has been involved in every stage of the research. She collected 120-cm peat cores with Dr. Adam Benfield, subsampled them at high resolution, processed sediments for charcoal analysis, and spent hours at the microscope identifying charcoal fragments and botanical macrofossils. She also conducted loss-on-ignition analyses to quantify organic matter accumulation. The radiocarbon dates funded by the grant allow her project to move beyond observation into a full paleoenvironmental reconstruction.
Maria will present her preliminary findings at the Northeastern Section GSA meeting. Beyond the data itself, the experience has given her confidence in designing a research project, planning and executing field and lab work, and connecting observations to broader environmental questions. “The grant allowed me to turn an idea into real research,” she says. “Every step, from fieldwork to lab work, has taught me how to think critically, plan carefully, and see how small pieces fit into a bigger environmental story.”
Her mentors also highlight her contributions. Dr. Benfield says, “Maria approaches complex paleoenvironmental questions with creativity and rigor. She’s gaining skills and experience that will serve her well in graduate research.”
Maria’s interest in science began early, but it was undergraduate research that solidified her career path. “Science is not just data collection—it’s about understanding processes, asking questions, and contributing to knowledge,” she says. “The GSA grant made it possible for me to experience that firsthand.”
Through this project, Maria exemplifies the impact of undergraduate research grants: providing opportunities to engage deeply in original science, develop professional skills, and gain confidence as an emerging scientist.
This original piece was provided by Macie Schiller with the Geological Society of America; used with permission.
March 26, 2026 – (Washington, DC) CUR congratulates Tsu-Ming Chiang (Georgia College & State University), Karen T. Lee (George Mason University), Jeanne Mekolichick (Radford University), and Patricia Morreale (Kean University) as they are appointed as 2026 CUR Fellows and inducted into the newly transformed CUR Fellows of Distinction (CURFD) Class. The CUR Fellows Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Research Leadership annually recognizes a class of CUR members who are leaders and role models within the undergraduate research community and whose careers represent the values and ideals represented in CUR’s Characteristics of Excellence in Undergraduate Research.
“The 2026 class of CUR Fellows reflects the strength and momentum of the undergraduate research movement. Drs. Chiang, Lee, Mekolichick, and Morreale have each played a critical role in advancing research opportunities, strengthening institutional cultures, and mentoring the next generation of scholars. Their leadership not only reflects CUR’s values but also helps shape the future of higher education. We are honored to recognize their contributions and the lasting impact of their work,” said Lindsay Currie, CUR’s Executive Officer.
Drs. Chiang, Lee, Mekolichick, and Morreale are to be honored for their leadership and service as role models for those involved in undergraduate research. This class of Fellows will be celebrated during a virtual Award Ceremony on Wednesday, June 10, 2026. You can RSVP to the ceremony here.
___________________
Tsu Ming Chiang, Georgia College & State University (GCSU)
Dr. Tsu-Ming Chiang has been named a CUR Fellow in recognition of more than three decades ofoutstanding mentorship, leadership, and scholarship advancing undergraduate research. Throughout her career, Dr. Chiang has created innovative and sustainable research opportunities that engage hundreds of undergraduate students in hands-on inquiry, collaborative learning, and community-engaged scholarship. Her work has helped expand access to research across disciplines, foster peer mentoring models, and integrate research experiences into the undergraduate curriculum. In addition to mentoring students who have gone on to careers and advanced study in psychology and related fields, Chiang has contributed nationally through CUR leadership, scholarship on undergraduate research practices, and initiatives that strengthen research culture and infrastructure at both institutional and national levels.
“Dr. Chiang’s sustained commitment to undergraduate research over more than three decades exemplifies the values and standards of excellence of the Council on Undergraduate Research,” explains Holley Roberts, provost and vice president for Academic Affairs at GCSU. “Her transformative work in mentorship, scholarship, and leadership has profoundly shaped undergraduate research at the institutional, regional, and national levels. Dr. Chiang has been instrumental in building research infrastructure that expands access and engagement for GCSU students.”
Chiang states, “I am deeply honored by the CUR Fellow award, which recognizes over three decades of mentoring efforts in undergraduate research (UR). I am grateful for the support I received from Georgia College & State University all these years. Throughout my career, engaging students in a wide range of UR activities to grow the next generation of learners and researchers is rooted in the core values of CUR. I always view a mentor as a gardener who plants seeds of curiosity and nurtures the minds of young scholars. It is a joy to see that this research garden is now full of beautiful plants that continue to spread seeds and grow more fruits.”
___________________
Karen T. Lee, George Mason University
Dr. Karen T. Lee has dedicated more than three decades to advancing undergraduate research through mentorship, program development, and national leadership. Beginning her career as a faculty researcher in biology, she has mentored dozens of undergraduate students in ecological research, with nearly half of her peer-reviewed publications including undergraduate coauthors. Her leadership has been instrumental in institutionalizing undergraduate research programs at multiple institutions, including establishing campus-wide research symposia and serving as the first undergraduate research coordinator at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown. Currently serving as Associate Director of the Office of Student Creative Activities and Research (OSCAR) at George Mason, Dr. Lee continues to expand access to research opportunities through innovative funding programs, peer-leadership models, and cross-campus collaborations. Her sustained contributions have helped hundreds of students engage in meaningful research experiences and have strengthened the undergraduate research ecosystem locally, regionally, and nationally.
“Karen Lee’s recognition as a Fellow of the Council on Undergraduate Research reflects her steadfast leadership in advancing undergraduate research and mentoring students,” said Ajay Vinzé, Interim Provost at George Mason University. “Through her work with OSCAR, she has expanded opportunities for George Mason students to engage in discovery, scholarship, and creative inquiry, and her national recognition will further strengthen George Mason’s commitment to undergraduate research.”
Lee states, “I am thrilled to be one of the recipients of the CUR Fellows Award. My career has been focused on broadening opportunities for students to do research, creative, or scholarly projects. Everything I learned about undergraduate research, I learned from CUR. It has been the most valuable professional affiliation of my career, and I have tried to give back to CUR what it gave to me. I am honored to be recognized for my work at my own institutions and at CUR.”
_________________
Jeanne Mekolichick, Radford University
Dr. Jeanne Mekolichick is being recognized as a CUR Fellow for her distinguished leadership, scholarship, and national advocacy advancing undergraduate research as a powerful driver of student success and career readiness. A former CUR President, Mekolichick has played a pivotal role in elevating the national conversation about the value of undergraduate research in preparing students for the workforce and addressing critical societal needs. Throughout her career, she has mentored students, embedded research across the curriculum, built institutional infrastructure that expands access to high-impact research experiences, and secured significant external funding to support faculty development and student engagement. Her leadership within CUR and across higher education has helped articulate the transferable skills gained through undergraduate research and strengthened the connection between mentored inquiry, career preparation, and the broader value of higher education.
“Jeanne’s thoughtful career trajectory has had a mission – to develop and emphasize how undergraduate research prepares students for their professional lives,” said Bethany Usher, provost and senior vice president of Academic Affairs at Radford University.
“The opportunity to serve as a 2026 CUR Fellow is particularly meaningful because of the deep impact that the CUR community has had in shaping my career—mentors who opened doors, colleagues who challenged me to grow, and student collaborators who reminded me why this work matters so much,” explains Mekolichick. “Our shared commitment to advancing the transformative power of undergraduate research has been my compass. I am grateful for the opportunity to continue to give back to the CUR community that has invested so much in me.”
_____________________
Patricia Morreale, Kean University
Dr. Patricia Morreale, Professor of Computer Science and Chair of the Department of Computer Science and Technology at Kean University, has built a career focused on expanding undergraduate research opportunities in computing and technology fields. Through her leadership and mentorship, she has guided students in applied research projects that link classroom learning with real-world challenges in networking, cybersecurity, and emerging technologies. Dr. Morreale is a strong advocate for inclusive participation in STEM research, creating pathways for students from diverse backgrounds to engage in scholarly discovery and professional growth. She has also expanded faculty development for undergraduate research mentoring, scaling inclusive mentoring practices at Kean University and nationally through scholarship and collaboration. Her work has strengthened the culture of undergraduate research at Kean University and helped prepare the next generation of innovators and technology leaders.
“Dr. Morreale’s selection as a CUR Fellow reflects her exceptional leadership and commitment to advancing student scholarship,” said Kean University President Lamont O. Repollet, Ed.D. “By expanding access to high-impact research opportunities, securing significant support for student initiatives, and mentoring the next generation of scholars, she has made a transformative impact at Kean and far beyond our campus. We are extraordinarily proud of her well-deserved national recognition.”
“I am deeply honored to be named a CUR Fellow,” said Morreale. “At Kean, undergraduate research is one of the most powerful ways we prepare students to think critically, innovate, and lead. The excellence in undergraduate research exemplified by the CUR community inspires me to expand access to these opportunities and develop strong mentorship systems, which are central to my work, and I remain deeply committed to advancing that mission.”