Honors students (from L to R) Christian Savastano ’25, Chloe Peterson ’25, Mya Rivard ’24, Jillian Hendriksen ’25 and Reiley Perreault ’25 present their recommendations to Cancer Help Desk.
Chloe Peterson ’25 never anticipated she could make a difference in the lives of cancer patients and their families — without leaving her Bentley classroom.
“As a Data Analytics major, I’m used to working with large datasets, and it’s easy to forget that those numbers often represent real people with real experiences,” she explains. But after completing an Honors Capstone course with Helen Meldrum, an associate professor of Natural and Applied Sciences, last spring, Peterson says she’s experienced a “profound shift in perspective that’s added a new layer of empathy and understanding to my work.”
Under Meldrum’s mentorship, Peterson and four other students from Bentley’s Honors Program — Jillian Hendriksen ’25, Reiley Perreault ’25, Mya Rivard ’24 and Christian Savastano ’25 — served as business consultants for Cancer Help Desk, a virtual startup that launched in August 2023 to provide personalized education, guidance and support to individuals dealing with cancer. Through its online platform, the nonprofit connects patients and caregivers with experienced oncology nurses and other medical experts who can answer questions, identify local resources and suggest individualized treatment options to discuss with healthcare providers, a process collectively known as cancer navigation.
Two of Cancer Help Desk’s co-founders, CEO Rebecca Driscoll and Chief Patient Officer Deb Christensen, reached out to Meldrum — a well-regarded figure within the cancer care community, owing to her 35-plus year career as a healthcare consultant, primarily with oncology-focused organizations — for help identifying ways to increase awareness of and support for their organization. Meldrum, in turn, enlisted her students to help think through the nonprofit’s challenges.
According to the National Cancer Institute, approximately 40% of Americans will be diagnosed with cancer at some point during their lifetimes. Longstanding inequities in the U.S. healthcare system, however, prevent many cancer patients from receiving timely access to quality care — in particular, Americans living in rural areas, which offer fewer prevention, detection and treatment facilities. Additional research has shown that other social determinants of health, such as race, gender and economic status, contribute to significant disparities in cancer incidences and outcomes.
Cancer Help Desk aims to address this imbalance by offering any patient or caregiver, regardless of their income, identity or geographical location, a free, 2.5-hour consultation session with a certified oncology nurse. “Cancer care is overwhelmingly challenging, and it can often feel like no one is listening,” Driscoll explains. “By offering compassion and clinical expertise, we ensure that patients understand all available testing and treatment options and ultimately feel empowered to advocate for their own care.”
For many of the students, discovering the complexities of cancer care proved eye-opening: “I was shocked to discover how splintered cancer care is, even among oncology specialists,” says Savastano, a Corporate Finance and Accounting major who, as a participant in Bentley’s Advanced Standing in Finance program, will graduate this May with both a bachelor’s and master’s degree. “Given cancer’s prominence as a public health issue, I was also shocked to learn how many patients in America struggle to find high-quality or even consistent care.”
With input from Driscoll and Christensen, the students created a survey consisting of both multiple choice and open-ended questions to help them better understand cancer patients’ needs and experiences. After identifying 1,000-plus oncology support groups serving primarily rural areas in all 50 states, the team distributed the survey via email and social media. Responses revealed that communication was a significant concern for patients, with 34% of respondents agreeing with the statement “I feel there are treatment options that have not been shared with me.” Respondents also shared frustration about having to coordinate care from multiple doctors and oncology specialists. “I wish I had someone to coordinate with providers … at a certain point, it’s so hard to keep track of tests and appointments,” one respondent noted. And 27% of patients and caregivers reported negative experiences with health insurance companies, including financial anxieties and treatment delays.
While the students were tabulating their survey results, the Biden administration announced it had brokered agreements with leading health insurance companies to expand coverage for cancer navigation services for more than 150 million Americans. This news led to one of the team’s major recommendations for Cancer Help Desk: Collaborating directly with insurance companies. That way, Savastano says, the nonprofit can make its services known to various providers while learning more about differences in cancer care coverage that can help with their client consultations.
The student consultants also recommended that Cancer Health Desk partner with mental health specialists to provide additional resources for clients’ emotional support, and that the nonprofit apply for corporate and foundation grants to support its long-term operational costs. The team also suggested improvements to the Cancer Help Desk website, several of which — such as featuring consultation information more prominently, adding client testimonials and including photos and bios of the organization’s co-founders and volunteers (“to lend greater credibility by emphasizing the people behind the product,” Savastano explains) — Driscoll and Christensen have since implemented. Both Cancer Help Desk co-founders are grateful to Meldrum and her students for their thorough research and thoughtful analysis.
The students are similarly appreciative of the experience. “Working with Cancer Help Desk gave me an opportunity to work as part of a diverse team, communicate directly with stakeholders and manage a project with real-world implications,” Peterson explains. And while she acknowledges that “these skills and insights will be invaluable to my future career,” it’s not her primary takeaway.
“I think STEM-related majors often forget that data represents real people with real experiences,” she says. “This experience has shown me how important it is for businesses to make informed, ethical decisions that positively impact society.”
Written by Molly Mastantuono for Bentley University; used with permission. Find the original article here.
The Council on Undergraduate Research (CUR) congratulates the following 38 teams who were accepted to be a part of the 2025-26 Scholars Transforming Through Research (STR) Program. The STR Program is a competitive application-based professional development opportunity for teams consisting of a campus representative and one to four undergraduate students. These teams will participate in a multi-month program aimed at developing their communication and advocacy skills, which will empower them to convey the power of the high-impact practices of undergraduate research and their own research experiences.
“At a time when research, innovation, and civic engagement are deeply interconnected, this new STR cohort embodies the next generation of scholar-advocates. Their commitment to advancing undergraduate research and amplifying its impact will help shape stronger institutions and more informed communities. CUR is proud to support these students and mentors as they develop the skills to champion research as both a catalyst for discovery and a cornerstone of our vision of better lives and a better future through undergraduate research.”
Lindsay Currie, CUR executive officer
This 2025-26 class of STR participants represents 34 institutions from 15 states and consists of 38 campus representatives and 106 undergraduate researchers.
Stephen F. Austin State University | Holli Heim, Kiel Garrett, Misty Ledesma, Olivia Payne, Sarah Straub
University of Texas at El Paso | Angela Cole, Anna Rascon-Prieto, Karina Canaba, Luis Acosta, Roberto Garza
University of Texas at San Antonio | Christopher Sauceda, Darrell Balderrama, Fiona Valorz, Jibel Mendez, Oscar Reyes Parker
Virginia
Radford University | Abigail Craig, Alexis (Lou) O’Neil, Caleb Frankenberger, Carlee Bradbury, Daniel Berry, Jessica Handy, Jessica McCann, Kayla Fields, Lily Backus, Natalie Infante, Naveen Joseph, Nicholas Beach, Patrick Kielawa, Rhett Herman
University of Mary Washington | Abigail Powers, Brooke Martin, Laura Sipe, Lillian Burbulis, Tyler Downs
West Virginia
West Virginia University | Christopher Arnold, Madison Metrick
The STR Program will run from November 2025 through March 2026. You can find out more information about this advocacy program at www.CUR.org/STR or follow our social media channels and #CURSTR.
SPUR advances knowledge and understanding of innovative and effective methods for mentored undergraduate research, scholarship, and creative inquiry by publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed studies authored by scholars and practitioners. The new EIC, in collaboration with the publisher, will steer the journal into the future for all engaged in undergraduate research, scholarship, and practice worldwide. The EIC will also continue to position SPUR as the leading resource for individuals interested in quality undergraduate education and professional development—such as postsecondary administrators, faculty, staff, researchers, and student mentors—both on- and off-campus, as well as industry professionals. To address the evolving needs of these stakeholders, the new EIC will have the opportunity to adapt the journal to accommodate changes in the dissemination of research, the sharing of lived experiences, and emerging practices in undergraduate research.
SPUR’s EIC will be recognized as a leader and scholar within the CUR community and the field served by the journal who embodies CUR’s values and principles. They are highly respected and actively involved in the field, regularly publishing significant content. The EIC has the professional insight to understand the future direction of the field and can develop and communicate a strategic vision aligned with CUR’s mission, vision, and goals. They use strong leadership skills to assemble and motivate the appropriate Editorial Board members. They also excel in interpersonal communication and are regarded as effective communicators. They embrace innovative technologies and have a proven track record of solid time management and delegation skills. They collaborate effectively with others and are decisive decision-makers who follow through promptly and efficiently on decisions. The EIC reports to and is accountable to the publisher, who also serves as the CUR Executive Officer, overseeing all peer review management and publishing operations. Together, the EIC and publisher work to complete editorial evaluations, establish the journal’s 3- to 5-year strategic framework, and assess the journal’s performance.
Responsibilities:
Ambassadorship: Act as the journal’s ambassador, promoting its significance within the community. Engage with audiences at relevant CUR conferences and events.
Editorial Leadership: Lead and empower the editorial board, conducting regular meetings to strategize manuscript recruitment and address performance metrics. Mentor and support the professional development of editors, authors, and reviewers.
Editorial Oversight: Assume full responsibility for all peer-reviewed content, including the solicitation, selection, scheduling, and editing of materials that align with CUR’s mission, vision, and values while advancing undergraduate research. Work collaboratively with editors, authors, and reviewers, adopting practices that ensure the timely publication of the journal on the agreed publication schedule.
Peer Review Management: Oversee the peer review process to ensure adherence to best practices and prompt, fair decisions on manuscripts. Manage editorial policies, resolve disputes, and address other content-related issues.
Stakeholder Collaboration: Work closely with the publisher, journal staff, CUR staff, and external vendors to ensure timely publication and effective content promotion.
Strategic Planning: Collaborate with the publisher to develop a 3- to 5-year strategic plan in alignment with CUR’s organizational goals. Report on journal performance and progress toward strategic goals to CUR’s Executive Committee.
Term:
This is a 5-year term, with the option of one 2-year extension, which will be discussed in the annual journal performance review. The EIC receives a yearly honorarium for the work on behalf of SPUR. Travel related to editorial strategy will be reimbursed in accordance with the annual budget for the journal as approved by the Publisher.
Qualifications:
To perform this job successfully, an individual must be able to perform each essential job function satisfactorily. The requirements listed below represent the knowledge, skills, and/or abilities required. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform essential functions.
Proven record of authorship in peer-reviewed journals.
Editorial experience as a reviewer or board member.
Strong leadership and interpersonal skills.
Experience promoting, mentoring, or facilitating undergraduate research.
Success in collaboration with diverse stakeholders.
Exceptional oral and written communication skills.
Must be a member of CUR at the start of the role.
Application Process:
Interested applicants are invited to submit:
Brief (less than two pages) vision statement describing how to grow SPUR into the future, addressing the diverse needs of researchers and practitioners.
Curriculum vitae
Candidates advancing to the final round will be asked to submit three references, including their contact details and how they know the candidate. References will not be contacted without the finalist’s approval.
All applications will be presented for consideration to the Editor Search Committee, chaired by Julio Rivera, Ph.D. (Emeritus Professor of Management, Carthage College; Choropleth Consulting, LLC)and comprised of leaders within the CUR community.
Nomination Process:
Nominations are welcome. If you wish to nominate a colleague, please share their contact information with the search committee by sending an email to eicsearch@cur.org.
I hope the start of the academic year is bringing energy and inspiration to you and your students. As we step into this new season, I want to share some exciting updates from the CUR Board of Directors and invite you to be part of shaping what comes next.
This Fall marks the launch of CUR’s new strategic plan, a roadmap designed to guide us toward CUR Twenty30. Grounded in our mission and values, the plan reflects months of listening, learning, and envisioning how undergraduate research can rise to meet the challenges and opportunities of our time. You’ll see CUR continuing to amplify the transformative impact of undergraduate research, strengthen support for our members, and position our community as a driver of innovation and knowledge creation. I encourage you to check out CUR Twenty 30.
Our Board has already begun leaning into this future-focused work. This year, they are dedicating time to foresight, beginning with a deep dive into artificial intelligence (AI) and its implications for CUR and undergraduate research (UR). At the same time, divisions are moving forward with action plans to engage the community in content, and the Council is kicking off its work for the year, diving deep into COEUR, AI, and UR in online education.
We’re also celebrating several important updates across CUR:
Elevating Advocacy: Advocacy is the core to advancing undergraduate research. Policies that shape research funding, education priorities, and campus resources are influenced by those willing to speak up. That is why it is so important that CUR members share their perspectives — whether through our new Advocacy Take Action Toolor directly with representatives at the local, state, and national level. Your voice carries weight in these conversations, and when added together, our collective impact is powerful. Recent campaigns have already engaged members in defending federal science and education funding, and more are ahead.
COEUR 2.0 Resource Pages:Now live, explore the many pages that offer practical tools for strengthening undergraduate research programs tied to each of the 11 characteristics.
Finally, as CUR moves into this exciting chapter, we need strong leaders to help guide the work. The call for nominations for elected volunteer leadership positionsis open. Serving as a CUR leader is an opportunity to shape the future of undergraduate research, strengthen our community, and ensure that our collective advocacy is heard. I encourage you to consider stepping forward or nominating a colleague.
Together, we are building the future, one that is resilient, innovative, and inclusive. Thank you for the work you do every day to mentor students, push the boundaries of discovery, and carry forward the mission of CUR.
With gratitude and excitement, Lindsay Currie Executive Officer
VIU students enrolled in an interdisciplinary team-based research course confronted a mounting issue experienced on campuses across Canada: student hunger.
Six students – Meagan Sharpe, Jenna Sportak, Riddhiman Saha, Sydney Gallant, Kyle Wickland and Esther Ovie – completed a research project that investigated food security on all three Vancouver Island University campuses through the Community-Based Applied Interdisciplinary Research program. The course is open to third-year undergraduate students as well as graduate students and is entirely student-led, with research projects designed and carried out by the students.
The project
The year-long project investigated the state of food security amongst the student body at the Nanaimo, Cowichan and tiwšɛmawtxʷ campuses. Part of a larger initiative to tackle student hunger that includes food pantries and emergency financial aid as well as research, $15,000 in funding was provided by The Embark Student Foundation Major Grant Program for the research project.
“One of the most empowering experiences for me was being able to be on the ground and talking to students, conducting a literature review and disseminating the work we did in the first semester, talking to stakeholders and getting an understanding of what’s going on in our campuses,” says Jenna, a fourth-year Sociology and Women & Gender Studies student.
Collecting the data
The team created food packets to recruit participants for an online survey, the primary method of data collection. The packages included a juice box, granola bar, some chocolate and a fruit snack. Inside each was a card that had a stat obtained from the government of Canada about student food security with a QR code linking to the survey.
“Our questions focused on what can VIU do as an institution to enhance food security, and what do students need to be food secure?” says Jenna. “We also attended campus events to raise awareness about food security and created a food walkability map. Three of our team members also participated in a secondary university project about food insecurity, The Hunger Hack challenge.”
What they discovered
Of the more than 300 survey respondents, 35 per cent identified as food insecure and 74 per cent said food insecurity is a problem at VIU. Lack of affordable food was also noted, with 77 per cent reporting the cost of food on campus as a barrier. Students said the hours of operation at the cafeteria were inadequate, and there are no on-campus food services open on weekends.
The team found that international student respondents were at the highest risk of being food insecure.
“We also found there is a significant lack of culturally appropriate food options and allergen-free options to meet dietary needs,” says Jenna. “For example, someone with celiac disease faces an additional $2 to $3 upcharge for gluten-free bread, so instead of paying $12 to $14 for a sandwich, they end up paying upwards of $15 or more, simply on the basis of needing to meet dietary requirements that are not a choice. Many university students cannot afford that.”
The team created a walkability map that showed limited affordable food options within a one-kilometer walking radius from the Nanaimo campus. The closest grocery store is a 20-minute walk away. Centralization of food services on campus is a significant barrier for students with back-to-back classes.
Students identifying as food insecure use short-term coping strategies, the survey found:
47 per cent skip meals, with anywhere from zero to 20 meals skipped per week.
42 per cent rely on discounted products.
8 per cent said they have resorted to unconventional methods such as stealing food or even dumpster diving.
“It’s clear that the student body has overwhelmingly identified the cost of food on campus as the most significant barrier,” says Jenna. “We continue to see costs increase, so students are left with little in their pockets and little in their stomachs.”
Solutions
The team has a list of recommendations for improving food security on our campuses including having a student representative at the students’ union and on the Board of Governors who can speak specifically to food security issues.
Other suggestions include an at-cost or sliding scale market on campus, or a small grocery store on campus.
“Students want to know why we don’t have more small businesses on campus, such as more food trucks or other local businesses like that. And they want the university to implement a program to advertise and sell unused food items from the cafeterias at the end of the day at significantly discounted prices, or free after certain hours,” says Jenna.
Next steps
“Food security has always been a thing for university students, and I think we’re really trying to ensure that that conversation doesn’t go away,” says Jenna. “Our intention is to give this report to the Acting President to be able to better inform where the remainder of the funds that we received from the Embark Grant should go.”
Sydney, Meagan and Jenna will present this research at the Canadian Sociological Association Conference in Toronto June 1 to 6.
“I’m committed to continuing to advocate for expanded food security initiatives,” says Jenna. “I always thought research wasn’t for me, but being involved in CBAIR gave me a lot of new skills and opened a lot of doors for me. I just feel privileged to have been able to do the work that I did this year, and to get credit for it and to go to the CSA conference in Toronto, to speak about something I am so passionate about.”
Written by Annette Lucas for Vancouver Island University; used with permission. Find the original article here.
The Council on Undergraduate Research is happy to announce our support for and participation in an exciting campaign to educate the public and policymakers about the vital role played by NIH. The strictly non-partisan campaign is led by an alliance we belong to called Research!America. Right now, the campaign is completing extensive public opinion research to have the most compelling messaging and talking points at our fingertips. In addition to ads the campaign will run in the D.C. Beltway, the research will be used in the outreach below.
We need you to share your stories and be engaged! Here is more information:
If you live in one of four target states, Kansas, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Utah, we need you to share your stories.
Have you been impacted by NIH funding cuts or budget uncertainty? How does your research illustrate why federal funding for medical and health research is crucial?
The campaign will help to place non-partisan stories in local press, radio, TV and online. Media training will be provided and anonymity can be arranged.
If you are willing to consider this opportunity, please reach out to nihstories@skdknick.com as soon as possible and mention your society affiliation.
For ALL members, the Research!America campaign will include opportunities for outreach to members of Congress and engagement with the public through op-eds and letters to the editor.
A special landing page, available after Labor Day, will provide the tools needed for effective advocacy. Optional online training will be offered by Research!America.
Stay tuned for more information
For questions about the campaign and our involvement, please email: advocacy@cur.org
You can also reach out to Research!America’s campaign lead, Jenny Luray, Senior Vice President for Strategy and Public Engagement: jluray@researchamerica.org